Preemption of Broadband Internet

LSSC-IssueSpecific-BroadbandThumb.png

This is the latest in a series of LSSC toolkits aimed at providing a one-stop-shop for all of the messaging, media, legal, and research resources associated with individual issue areas that are commonly preempted. Click here to view them all.

This document was last updated in April 2022.

Messaging 101

  • The pandemic has proven that a quality broadband internet connection is a necessity. The internet is indisputably essential for Americans who work from home, engage in distance learning, and/or are in need of accessing medical care or government services like Social Security. But millions of people across our country either cannot access or cannot afford the internet. 

  • Developing or expanding existing municipal broadband networks would help meet that need.  

    • But 18 states currently have laws in place banning or limiting local broadband — limitations that disproportionately hurt BIPOC communities, workers in low-wage industries, and rural residents even before the pandemic.

  • The reality is that the national cable and telephone companies behind these laws banning or limiting municipal broadband are focused on maximizing their short-term revenues. They have little incentive to develop sustainable models that ensure affordable, reliable internet access. Instead, they use their lobbying power to block new innovative business models that would create competition – even in areas that are not well-served.

  • That’s why some cities have developed government-owned, fast, reliable broadband access for its residents. And why some states (including Arkansas and Washington) have repealed their bans on municipal broadband. 

  • It’s time for state lawmakers to acknowledge the fundamental need to increase access to strong, reliable and affordable broadband.

Media Examples

Additional Resources

Adam Polaski